首页 > 资讯 > Retrospective Analysis of the Psychological Predictors of Public Health Support in Bulgarians at the Beginning of the Coronavirus Pandemic,Brain Sciences

Retrospective Analysis of the Psychological Predictors of Public Health Support in Bulgarians at the Beginning of the Coronavirus Pandemic,Brain Sciences

泰然健康网
2025-05-08 03:01

The earliest critical context of the pandemic, preceding the first real epidemiological wave of contagion in Bulgaria, was examined using a socio-affective perspective. A retrospective and agnostic analytical approach was adopted. Our goal was to identify traits and trends that explain public health support (PHS) of Bulgarians during the first two months of the declared state of emergency. We investigated a set of variables with a unified method within an international scientific network named the International Collaboration on Social & Moral Psychology of COVID-19 (ICSMP) in April and May 2020. A total of 733 Bulgarians participated in the study (67.3% females), with an average age of 31.8 years (SD = 11.66). Conspiracy Theories Beliefs were a significant predictor of lower PHS. Psychological Well-Being was significantly associated with Physical Contact and Anti-Corona Policy Support. Physical Contact was significantly predicted by fewer Conspiracy Theories Beliefs, higher Collective Narcissism, Open-mindedness, higher Trait Self-Control, Moral Identity, Risk Perception and Psychological Well-Being. Physical Hygiene compliance was predicted by fewer Conspiracy Theories Beliefs, Collective Narcissism, Morality-as-Cooperation, Moral Identity and Psychological Well-Being. The results revealed two polar trends of support and non-support of public health policies. The contribution of this study is in providing evidence for the affective polarization and phenomenology of (non)precarity during the outbreak of the pandemic.

中文翻译：

冠状病毒大流行开始时保加利亚人公共卫生支持心理预测因素的回顾性分析

在保加利亚第一次真正的流行病学传染浪潮之前，对大流行最早的关键背景进行了社会情感视角的研究。采用了回顾性和不可知论的分析方法。我们的目标是确定可以解释保加利亚人在宣布进入紧急状态的头两个月期间的公共卫生支持 (PHS) 的特征和趋势。我们于 2020 年 4 月和 2020 年 5 月在名为“COVID-19 社会与道德心理学国际合作组织”(ICSMP) 的国际科学网络内使用统一方法调查了一组变量。共有 733 名保加利亚人参与了这项研究（67.3% 的女性)，平均年龄 31.8 岁 (SD = 11.66)。阴谋论信念是较低 PHS 的重要预测指标。心理健康与身体接触和反电晕政策支持显着相关。更少的阴谋论信仰、更高的集体自恋、思想开放、更高的特质自我控制、道德认同、风险感知和心理健康显着预测了身体接触。更少的阴谋论信仰、集体自恋、合作道德、道德认同和心理健康可以预测身体卫生依从性。结果揭示了支持和不支持公共卫生政策的两种极端趋势。这项研究的贡献是为大流行爆发期间的（非）不稳定的情感两极分化和现象学提供证据。更少的阴谋论信仰、更高的集体自恋、思想开放、更高的特质自我控制、道德认同、风险感知和心理健康显着预测了身体接触。更少的阴谋论信仰、集体自恋、合作道德、道德认同和心理健康可以预测身体卫生依从性。结果揭示了支持和不支持公共卫生政策的两种极端趋势。这项研究的贡献是为大流行爆发期间的（非）不稳定的情感两极分化和现象学提供证据。更少的阴谋论信仰、更高的集体自恋、思想开放、更高的特质自我控制、道德认同、风险感知和心理健康显着预测了身体接触。更少的阴谋论信仰、集体自恋、合作道德、道德认同和心理健康可以预测身体卫生依从性。结果揭示了支持和不支持公共卫生政策的两种极端趋势。这项研究的贡献是为大流行爆发期间的（非）不稳定的情感两极分化和现象学提供证据。更少的阴谋论信仰、集体自恋、合作道德、道德认同和心理健康可以预测身体卫生依从性。结果揭示了支持和不支持公共卫生政策的两种极端趋势。这项研究的贡献是为大流行爆发期间的（非）不稳定的情感两极分化和现象学提供证据。更少的阴谋论信仰、集体自恋、合作道德、道德认同和心理健康可以预测身体卫生依从性。结果揭示了支持和不支持公共卫生政策的两种极端趋势。这项研究的贡献是为大流行爆发期间的（非）不稳定的情感两极分化和现象学提供证据。